April 21, 2008
Re-Talibanization
No one expected Kandahar to become Amsterdam overnight (the likelihood of Amsterdam becoming Kandahar is a subject for another post), and as the Christian Science Monitor reports, there remains considerable resistance to re-introducing the cultural restrictions imposed by the Taliban.
That doesn't make this story much less depressing and infuriating, though:
Shafi Samandari thought the days of the Taliban would never come back. "I love listening to music and going to wedding parties," the Kabul resident says. "After the Taliban was toppled, I was sure that we could start living normally again."The Taliban may not be returning anytime soon, but if some Afghan lawmakers have their way, Taliban-era laws will once again reign over the country. Last week, a group of members of parliament (MPs) put forth draft legislation that would ban T-shirts, loud music, women and men mingling in public, billiards, video games, playing with pigeons, and more – all regulations from the notorious Taliban era.
The move is the most recent attempt by religious conservatives to restrict "un-Islamic influences." Many observers say it's the latest sign of growing Talibanization in Afghanistan.
The draft law comes a week after members of parliament voted to ban wildly popular Indian soap operas from airing on Afghan channels.
The programs, emotional dramas featuring forbidden trysts, family intrigue, and Hindu imagery – drew the ire of conservatives and religious figures.
In January, Afghan journalist Perwiz Kambakhsh was put on death row for downloading an article from the Internet that questioned women's roles in Islam. Mr. Kambakhsh, who was convicted by an Islamic court, is scheduled to appeal in the coming weeks.
Late last year another prominent journalist, Ghaws Zalmai, was jailed for translating the Koran into the local Persian language.
While most analysts don't expect this most recent law to pass, there is a real threat that these moves will fuel religious conservatives and make the Taliban's ideas more acceptable, according to Haroun Mir cofounder and deputy director of the Afghan Center for Research and Policy Studies, based in Kabul.
"Even if the law doesn't pass, it will provide legitimacy for the Taliban by approving of Taliban-era laws," Mr. Mir says. This will bring together the fundamentalists, he adds, and put moderates on the defensive – creating a propitious climate for the proliferation of Taliban ideology.
I strongly support our mission in Afghanistan, but even I'll have to question what we're doing there if the Taliban's odious, medieval policies are brought back. For Canadians who don't think we should be there, it's yet another reason why. (via Hot Air)
A question: how much of the Taliban resurgence is directly caused by our futile, counterproductive attempt to eradicate one of the country's largest industries? (More here.)
Damian P.
Posted by damian at April 21, 2008 01:00 PM