March 31, 2005

Is bilingualism supposed to work this way?

Most Canadians have been guilt-tripped into accepting Quebec's oppressive, often ridiculous language laws, so opponents have to take their victories where they can find them. Today's Supreme Court of Canada judgment on language restrictions in the education system does order the Quebec government to loosen the standard for immigrants to the province who - gasp! - want their children educated in English, so I guess it's better than nothing. But if you're a Quebec francophone who wants your children educated in Canada's other official language, well...you're outta luck, Frenchy:

The Supreme Court of Canada has rejected claims by francophone Quebecers to let their children attend English language schools.

In a unanimous decision, the country's top court has upheld the language legislation in Quebec known as Bill 101 -- which obliges French speaking parents to send their kids to a francophone school.

A group of eight francophone families have been fighting hard for their children's right to attend English language schools, claiming they're being discriminated against.

"The Supreme Court ruled that the anti-discrimination provisions of the Charter of Rights do not override the language provisions of the Charter of Rights," reports CTV's Mike Duffy from Ottawa. "They stand side by side."

He added that the court has ruled that, "to allow French speaking parents to send their kids to English language school would swamp the English language school system in Quebec."

Under Bill 101, parents must have received the majority of their schooling in English if they want their kids to be eligible for English education in Quebec.

The parents' lawyer, Brent Tyler (who handles a lot of these Quebec-language-law cases, and therefore must have the patience of Job) says the parents plan to bring their case before the UN Human Rights Tribunal. Good luck, Brent.

Update: Sari Stein, an anglophone Quebecker, notes that this legislation hurts the very francophones whose culture it's supposed to "protect".

Posted by damian at 07:21 PM | Comments (14)

Last Rites

I've lost count of how many times Pope John Paul II has survived reports of his impending death, but this really looks like the end:

Pope John Paul II, whose health deteriorated suddenly on Thursday, has received the Roman Catholic sacrament reserved for the sick and dying, Italian media reported.

A Vatican spokesman said he could not confirm the reports but Church sources said it was likely the Pontiff had recieved the sacrament, given the precarious state of his health.

The sacrament, which involves annointing the sick person with special oils, was once called "Last Rites" or "Extreme Unction." It is now known as the Sacrament of the Infirm.

Earlier the pope's spokesman said the pope developed a high fever Thursday because of a urinary tract infection, and was being treated at the Vatican with antibiotics. The development came one day after the 84-year-old pontiff began receiving nutrition through a feeding tube.

I am not Catholic, and I strongly disagree with many of the Church's political positions. But Pope John Paul II deserves no small share of the credit for bringing down the Communist butchers of Eastern Europe, and for that I will always be grateful. Another "lapsed Anglican", Johnathan Pearce of Samizdata, expresses similar sentiments:

I am going to put any reflections on his contribution to the Catholic church, or his views about abortion, etc, to one side and focus on a more worldly fact about his extraordinary life and career. The Pope was, in my view, one of the three or four great men (and one great woman) who helped bring the Soviet Union, that evil and decrepit empire, crashing to its knees. Along with Ronald Reagan, Margaret Thatcher, Gorbachev [I'm not so sure about that one - Ed.] and arguably, the power of cheap television advertising, the Pope helped bring about communism's demise.

I do not share the Pope's faith, but in reflecting on his life on this Easter Sunday, it was hard not to suppress a lump in the throat. In my book, he is one of the giants of our age.

Posted by damian at 07:00 PM | Comments (6)

Quote of the Day

"I can explain this to you. I can't comprehend it for you."
- Ed Koch

(One of my readers mentioned this one in the comments section not long ago - and in my line of work, I'm tempted to use it about ten times a day.)

Posted by damian at 04:40 PM | Comments (1)

Terri Schiavo and our Brave New World

After 13 days without food or water, Terri Schiavo passed away this morning.

Just yesterday, via Bob Tarantino, I came across this Village Voice column by Nat Hentoff, one of the few columnists left in America not blindly beholden to the Democratic or Republican parties. Hentoff, an atheist and civil libertarian, called Schiavo's dehydration "the longest public execution in American history".

There's too much in the column to cite, and I ask you to read the whole thing. I also think Jay Nordlinger best captured my feelings about this whole matter in his NRO column:

Mrs. Schiavo has parents willing to feed her and watch over her. No one else need lift a finger. Terri Schiavo's continued existence is no skin off anyone else's nose. No one need bestir himself; no one has to visit; everyone can just go on doin' his thing: drinkin', buyin' Lotto tickets, chasing the neighbor's daughter — whatever. People can go on studying Shakespeare or exploring Patagonia. Terri's parents ask for nothing except that their daughter not be starved to death.

I believe that a lot of people simply want the case off their television screens. But they don't have to watch; and the media don't have to cover.
[...]
Maybe I'm dense, but I don't get it. Does deference to the natural order of things require starvation? A newborn would die of starvation — or dehydration — if not fed by his mother (or a caring other). Would that be natural? In a sense, I guess. No food, no continued material life — so has Momma Nature decreed! Terri Schiavo is not a child, but she is helpless to feed herself, and her mother wishes to feed her. (Why not?) People are often helpless, requiring the aid of others.

If the point is to have her dead — because it would be merciful to her — why go through this starvation/dehydration? Why not, indeed, shoot her, or smother her with a pillow — whatever? And I'm not sure that passively standing by should be honored as "deference to the natural order of things." We intervene all the time, to stop bad outcomes.

But this is beginning to sound like kindergarten class — and the Schiavo case does, it is true, return us to the basics.

If we don't know for sure whether someone wishes to live or die, we have always presumed she wants to live. That, it seems to me, has always been the natural order of things. But a woman was condemned to a slow, excrutiating death when we don't know what she really wanted - and the media, to its enduring shame, has framed this as a "right-to-die" issue.

Yes, death is part of life. It's going to happen to all of us someday, and I can think of circumstances where I'd probably prefer to die than be kept alive. But once you die, that's it. I don't know what happens when you do pass away, but you ain't coming back to the life you had just before. That's certain. And it's why, if someone is going to be "allowed to die", we'd better make darn sure that's what they want. (For a similar reason, the possibility of taking the wrong person's life explains my opposition to capital punishment - though opposing the death penalty can be really, really hard in some cases.)

I've been told this kind of thing has been going on for a long time, and in the "progressive" Netherlands they've already moved on to euthanizing newborn babies with serious illnesses and handicaps. But I feel like a line has just been crossed, and I don't like where we're going.

Rest in peace, Ms. Schiavo.

Posted by damian at 11:37 AM | Comments (22)

Jack Frost is back, and he's been drinking again

The snow was almost all gone, and when a predicted snowstorm didn't arrive on time, I confidently predicted we were never going to get it. Well, here's what contronted me this morning.

Message to Glenn: if you post any springtime photos of Tennesee today, your iPod and digital camera may have a little "accident".

Posted by damian at 08:24 AM | Comments (4)

March 30, 2005

The missing movies

Speaking of Hollywood, Bridget Johnson asks an excellent question in OpinionJournal: there are two more Che Guevara biopics in development (in addition to last year's Motorcycle Diaries) but where are the movies showing the horrors of life under Communism?

What feature films have showed the true nature of communism? There was "The Killing Fields," showing families torn apart, cities emptied, forced labor, bones littering the Cambodian landscape. Adding to the authenticity was its star, Oscar-winner and real-life survivor Haing S. Ngor, who would have been summarily executed had his intellectual background been discovered by the Khmer Rouge. As a cinematic achievement, it ranks as one of the best films of all time. As a historical testament, it shows that communism had nothing to do with betterment of the masses but stripped away everything that comprised the individual. Though this film should be required high-school viewing, not much else springs to mind that could counter the effects of pro-Marxist cinema.

I'll bet the big studio execs have never thought--or cared--to do a big-screen adaptation of "The Black Book of Communism: Crimes, Terror, Repression," by Stephane Courtois, et al. The book's 1997 publishing in France touched off a firestorm of controversy--mostly from offended French commies--and it stands as an astonishing comprehensive account of what this political ideology has wreaked on mankind in less than a century. The film version of this 800-plus-page account would be excruciatingly long and painful--too long for a 32-ounce soda and too nauseating for popcorn. So since Hollywood is all about franchises now anyway, the book could be adapted into several movies, each covering a corner of the globe and that region's own unique suffering under communism.

How about a film on the Soviet Union, beginning with Lenin and the 1917 revolution, droning on to Stalin's purges with hundreds of thousands executed by firing squad, and millions forced from their homes or carted off to labor camps? We'd see Soviet bloc countries strangled under communist rule, Berlin divided with concrete and snipers, Nicolae Ceausescu destroying historic Bucharest. We'd see Soviet terror exported with the scorched-earth policy in Afghanistan.

Well, even The Killing Fields couldn't be made without Sam Waterston giving a big speech blaming Nixon for the rise of the Khmer Rouge. Aside from that and the immortal Red Dawn, I can't think of many other Hollywood productions showing the sheer drudgery and despair of life in the Worker's Paradise. (Kolya and Farewell my Concubine are great, but they're foreign films.)

So why hasn't Gang of One or Ayn Rand's We the Living (made in Italy in 1942, albeit bastardized by Mussolini) been produced yet? Maybe it would force Hollywood to concede that, despite the excesses and blacklisting of the McCarthy era, the man may have had a point.

Posted by damian at 07:19 PM | Comments (17)

Read it before Michael Bay's lawyers see it

This blog, allegedly written by the director of Pearl Harbor and Bad Boys (and definitely for mature audiences only) is the funniest thing you will read all week. I guarantee it. Lest you think the "Snakes on a Plane" pitch is a crazy idea, it's based on a real movie set for release in 2006.

The real Hollywood hasn't caught up with satire yet, but it's gaining.

(via Galley Slaves)

Posted by damian at 03:40 PM | Comments (0)

The spin zone

Almost every headline I've seen about the latest oil-for-food report contains some variation on the phrase, "Kofi Annan cleared of wrongdoing". But Mark Peith, one of the investigators, says this is not the case at all:

The probe into the Iraqi oil-for-food scandal has not cleared UN chief Kofi Annan, an investigator said today.

Mark Pieth rejected Annan’s declaration that the report, released yesterday, exonerated him on the matter of Cotecna Inspections winning a £5 million-a-year UN contract while he was secretary-general and it employed his son Kojo.

“We did not exonerate Kofi Annan,” Pieth said. “We should not brush this off. A certain mea culpa would have been appropriate.”

Pieth, a Swiss university professor of criminal law, also accused Cotecna of repeatedly lying about its links to Annan’s son.
[...]
A key conclusion was that Kofi Annan never interfered in the awarding of the contract to the Swiss company, but should have better investigated possible conflicts of interest after a British newspaper, the Sunday Telegraph, reported the link between Kojo Annan and Cotecna in January 1999.

In an interview with swissinfo.org, Peith says Annan should not be forced to resign, but that he did not take proper action against a probable conflict of interest involving his son. (Headline: "Expert says Annan has no reason to resign".)

I am prepared to believe Kofi Annan was not actively involved in any wrongdoing - but it's an established principle that the leader of a body like the UN should not allow even the appearance of wrongdoing, lest the organization's credibility be damaged. Mind you, there's not much more anyone could do to further damage the UN's image, but this report doesn't help, especially in light of details noted by the Financial Times:

Yesterday's report by the independent Volcker Commission provides fodder both for those who want Mr Annan stay on, and those who would prefer he resign.

On the one hand, the report found no evidence to support the central case against Mr Annan: that he helped steer a contract to Cotecna, an inspection firm, at the behest of his son, Kojo. It also says that Kojo Annan intentionally deceived his father, and that Cotecna disguised its relationship with him.

On the other, it says the UN's chief of staff shredded documents pertaining to the period under investigation, and raises questions about how much Mr Annan knew, and when.

In one case, the inquiry appears to catch Mr Annan in amisstatement. "When the secretary-general was first interviewed by the committee in November 2004, he said that he had not met Elie Massey [Cotecna's owner], prior to the award to Cotecna of the inspection contract."

But the inquiry found that he had met Mr Massey twice. One such meeting was on September 18 1998, the only "private" meeting during a busy period.

"A note to the secretary-general from his assistant makes it clear that it was Kojo Annan who arranged this second meet ing," the inquiry says. In a second interview in January this year, Mr Annan said he remembered both meetings.

The report also cites a number of Annan family ties. Michael Wilson, Cotecna's vice-president for marketing operations in Africa, was a "childhood friend of Kojo Annan from Ghana", and considered Kofi Annan like an "uncle". Mr Wilson's father had been Ghana's ambassador to Switzerland and was a long-standing friend of Kofi Annan, the report said.

If there's any hope of saving the UN, Kofi's gotta go, and an outsider - someone not already tainted by the organization's culture of corruption and incompetence - has to take his place.

Posted by damian at 09:08 AM | Comments (1)

The mask slips again

George Galloway's RESPECT Coalition is holding a fundraising lunch at London's Al-Waha Lebanese Restaurant this Sunday.

The promotional materials read, "Enjoy a Syrian Sunday Lunch".

Posted by damian at 07:58 AM | Comments (0)

March 29, 2005

You have the right to free speech, as long as you don't offend us

Daniel Pipes required police protection (and had to endure a lecture from the Police Department's Hate Crimes unit) the last time he came to a Toronto university, and now 110 Chomsky wannabes have signed an "open letter" - repeating, as usual, the dishonest smears promoted by CAIR - against his upcoming appearance at U of T. (Well, actually, they "affirm Pipes' right to speak at our university", but then say "hate, prejudice and fear-mongering have no place on this campus." Given the, um, expansive definition of "hate" used by these people, we can translate this statement as, "Pipes is welcome as long as he doesn't say anything we don't like.")

For a charter member of the neoconservative cabal that controls the world, Pipes sure has a hard time giving a speech without a bunch of brownshirted yahoos trying to shout him down. (But we're the fascists, of course.)

(via Small Dead Animals)

Posted by damian at 08:34 PM | Comments (17)

Invasion of the Chickenheads!

Real dissidents in places like Cuba, Zimbabwe and North Korea risk imprisonment and even death by speaking out against their governments. Meanwhile, wannabe dissident Ward Churchill, who insists he lives in the most totalitarian tyranny the world has ever known, remains free to justify the murder of 9/11 victims, fantasize about publicly executing American politicians (so much for that "stop the death pentalty" crap) and call for replacing the U.S. government with an anarchist utopia - all the while throwing in a few weasel words to ensure he won't have to take responsibility should one of his cultists be inspired to kill more "little Eichmanns".

And the leftists love him enough to wear kooky hats in public, which would presumably make them an easy target for Chimpy McBushitler's death squads:

chickenheads.jpg

There isn't another country on earth where Churchill could make such a good living ranting and raving about how much he hates it (except maybe Canada, where he'd probably get a grant from the Department of Canadian Heritage). And deep down, I think he knows it.

(via LGF)

Posted by damian at 01:32 PM | Comments (2)

"Sunshine" means darkness

Korean human-rights groups smuggled videotapes from North Korea showing dissidents being summarily executed - only to find that South Korea's "Sunshine Policy" of appeasement is keeping the footage under wraps:

On a bleached and scratchy video image smuggled out of Kim Jong Il's closed regime, blindfolded prisoners are tied to white posts on a rocky landscape, shot three times, and dragged away. The rare video footage of summary executions in North Korea - a practice considered routine in the North but never captured on film - was taken by hidden camera March 1 and 2, and smuggled through China to South Korea.

At the time, refugee groups in Seoul were ecstatic. It looked like a human rights slam-dunk: Refugees from the North have long described summary executions - public spectacles where prisoners are shot moments after a death sentence is proclaimed. The shootings are a form of social control via terror, experts say.

Yet in a twist not anticipated by underground groups that carried off the filming, South Korean TV authorities have not let the video be broadcast. The tape has been aired worldwide; Japan recently aired three exhaustive reports.

But due to intense though indirect pressure by Seoul officials, the North Korean execution tapes, purportedly of "middlemen" who help refugees escape to China, are not yet available for viewing by Koreans in the South. The indirect censure adds to frustration among those documenting the gulags and torture in the North. They charge indifference in the South to evidence of manifold suffering by ethnic siblings across the demilitarized zone.
[...]
Seoul's effort to avoid broadcasts of negative images or facts about North Korea is part of a larger strategy dating to the Sunshine Policy and Korean summit of 2000. In this view, unification of North and South can't be achieved if the South criticizes or acts in a manner that the North deems hostile. [emphasis added]

When the North Korean Communists are finally overthrown, people in South Korea are going to have a lot of explaining and apologizing to do.

Posted by damian at 11:54 AM | Comments (1)

Bad news for Kofi

Another report on the UN oil-for-food mess comes out today, in which investigators will chide Kofi Annan personally for failing to prevent corruption in the program - much of it involving his son:

UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan faces censure from investigators in the oil-for-food scandal, who will criticize him in a report to be released today for failing to prevent conflicts of interest in the massive humanitarian project, officials say.

Mr. Annan, who has been sharply criticized by anti-UN elements in the United States over his management of the project, will not be directly implicated in any conflict of interest but will be criticized for failing to confront his son about a questionable relationship with a United Nations supplier.

The Independent Inquiry Committee, headed by former U.S. Federal Reserve chairman Paul Volcker, will also take the Secretary-General to task for failing to detect shortcomings in the internal UN bureaucracy that allowed problems in the oil-for-food program to continue until 2003, a UN official said, speaking on condition of anonymity.
[...]
Prof. Luck said the first Volcker report and leaks from the one due today suggest that Mr. Annan was the product of a UN culture that turned a blind eye to corruption and conflict of interest.

"It is certainly a culture that breeds a reluctance to criticize one's peers and a reluctance to be a whistle blower," he said.

Advantage, Roger L. Simon.

Posted by damian at 08:14 AM | Comments (1)

60 years after Auschwitz...

...another regime is gassing political prisoners to death, according to Abraham Cooper of the Simon Wiesenthal Center:

I recently returned from debriefing North Korean defectors in Seoul who told me of their involvement in the Pyongyang regime's gassing of political prisoners, dating back to the 1970s and continuing into the 21st century. I traveled to South Korea after officials in Seoul refused to grant a visa to Dr. Lee Byom-Shik (a pseudonym) to come to the United States to serve as a key witness about alleged murders by gassing in North Korea. He was to testify at a Simon Wiesenthal Center conference on human rights abuses in North Korea.

Dr. Lee, 55, is a chemist who told me of his important "achievements" in serving the North Korean regime since the 1970s. He worked with one team that produced bogus Japanese diplomatic passports used by agents to smuggle aboard the bomb that brought down Korean Airlines Flight 001. He helped produce counterfeit $100 bills used by diplomats traveling abroad.

It took an hour into our debriefing for Dr. Lee to get around to the fact that he helped develop deadly agents at a secret underground poison and toxin research institute. In that connection, he matter-of-factly described how, in 1979, he was in charge of gassing two political prisoners. The victims' suffering was documented by scientists, who took notes outside glass-encased gas chambers that were also wired for sound. One prisoner died after 2 1/2 hours, the other after 3 1/2 hours of agony. Then a young scientist, Dr. Lee was rewarded with a medal and promotions for his role in these successful experiments. Twenty-five years later, he expressed no remorse, but his recall of details and dates make him a credible, if frightening, witness.

Another North Korean defector I interviewed was 31-year-old Chun Ji Suang (also a pseudonym). In 1994, while attending a prestigious scientific institute, he was selected to be part of two teams researching various types of gassing -- from slow-acting, untraceable poisons to be used for assassinations to those that would cause instantaneous death. For eight years these scientists constantly moved their base of operations throughout the North Korean gulag. He belonged to Team A, which experimented exclusively on animals. When they successfully concluded an experiment, Team B then used those results on human guinea pigs. Unlike Dr. Lee, this young man is very remorseful. His escape from North Korea was facilitated by a supervisor and other secret sympathizers who urged him to expose Kim Jong Il's atrocities.

Since 2002, defectors among the flood of refugees from North Korea have detailed firsthand accounts of systematic starvation, torture and murder. Enemies of the state are used in experiments to develop new generations of chemical and biological weapons that threaten the world. A microcosm of these horrors is Camp 22, one of 12 concentration camps housing an estimated 200,000 political prisoners facing torture or execution for such "crimes" as being a Christian or a relative of someone suspected of deviation from "official ideology of the state." Another eyewitness, Kwon Hyuk, formerly chief manager at Camp 22, repeated to me what he asserted to the BBC: "I witnessed a whole family being tested on suffocating gas and dying in the gas chamber. . . . The parents were vomiting and dying, but until the very last moment they tried to save kids by doing mouth-to-mouth breathing."

Meanwhile, a human-rights organization has released a video which purports to show North Koreans being summarily executed by firing squad for the crime of helping people escape the country.

Correction: it has, of course, been 60 years since Auschwitz was liberated, not 50. My mistake.

Posted by damian at 08:08 AM | Comments (2)

March 28, 2005

Right Honourable Movie Critics

Deadly, a low-budget movie based on the Paul Bernardo/Karla Homolka case (starring That 70's Show's Laura Prepon in the Homolka role) is set for release soon, giving Canadian politicans an irresistable opportunity to show their righteous indignation. Mike Brock, whom I had the pleasure of meeting in Toronto, asks whether this is really the business of our elected officials.

Of course, this is not exclusively a Canadian phenomenon. It seems like American politicians are frothing at the mouth over a different TV show/movie/CD/video game every week, and the same thing happens in every other country where there are politicians looking for the chance to score cheap political points at the expense of sleazy Hollywood types. That is, every country on earth. (Except for North Korea, where a sleazy Hollywood type is running the country.)

Personally, I had no idea anyone was making a film about the Bernardo case until Dalton McGuinty told me - and as sure as the day follows the night, what would otherwise be a forgettable slice of direct-to-DVD dreck (produced by "True Crime Ivestments, LLC") will become essential viewing when politicians get angry about it.

Posted by damian at 08:19 PM | Comments (0)

Stupid vs. Evil

Two responses to the question, "What are your hopes for Iraq parliament?" [sic] on the BBC website illustrate the difference. First, there's "DRL", from Milton Keynes, England:

I also wonder what emphasis can be put on the much touted 58% turnout for the coalition's elections, when the turnout for Saddam's elections was a lot more than that. Anybody like to enlighten me?

And then there's "Nina" from Toronto, who presumably has the right to vote in my country:

I hate to say this to Iraqis, but I pray for chaos and civil war: it's the only way to stop Bush's policies and show that peace can never come through force. If Iraq gets peace, Bush wins credibility. It cannot be allowed to happen.

(via Small Dead Animals)

Posted by damian at 08:06 PM | Comments (2)

Miracle in Zimbabwe

According to The Times, opponents of Robert Mugabe are starting to believe they can win the upcoming (and certainly rigged) election, and they aren't shy about saying so:

A few weeks ago, eager to confer legitimacy on the parliamentary election, Mr Mugabe ordered his youth militia to curb their violence and permit at least the semblance of democracy. The strange new atmosphere of calm — unseen for five years — has breathed unexpected life into a contest that had seemed certain to end in crushing victory for the ruling party.

From Chimanimani, a small town on the Mozambique border, to Tsholotsho, another small town on the far side of the country where the President’s former spin doctor is standing against the ruling Zanu (PF) party, to the capital, Harare, where 25,000 people attended an opposition rally yesterday, something remarkable is happening. Zimbabweans are openly challenging Mr Mugabe — and believe that his days may be numbered.

“In December I said we would be lucky to get 25 of the 120 seats,” David Coltart, Shadow Justice Minister for the opposition Movement for Democratic Change (MDC), said. “There is no doubt we will get the majority vote. There is a buzz here that I have never seen before.”

It may be false hope, of course. Nobody doubts the Government’s determination to rig the election. It has redrawn the electoral boundaries, will use intimidation at the polling stations and has apparently falsified the electoral roll. But such is the mood that the risks of defying the popular will are growing by the day.

Yesterday Pius Ncube, the Archbishop of Bulawayo and a fierce critic of Mr Mugabe, called for a “Ukraine-style, peaceful, popular uprising” if the election is stolen. Morgan Tsvangirai, the MDC leader, addressed 25,000 supporters yesterday at a football ground in Harare’s Highfield township — one of the biggest crowds seen in the capital since independence in 1980. “This time Mugabe is going for sure,” he said. “The world will be watching us. They think Zimbabweans are too passive and can’t remove Mugabe. Show them.”

Two months ago, Mr Tsvangirai would have been lucky to draw half the crowd. No one would have dared to raise their hands in the MDC’s traditional salute. Those wearing MDC T-shirts at rallies would pull them off as they left to avoid a beating. Yesterday thousands poured on to the streets sporting full MDC regalia, waving and cheering, though 150 were subsequently arrested.

Unfortunately, Heaven knows what Mugabe and his "war veterans" will do if they can't win their rigged election.

Posted by damian at 08:26 AM | Comments (0)

Blackmailing Newfoundland and Labrador

Just when it looked like the Newfoundland economy had turned a corner, news reports suggest the Atlantic Accord - which will give Newfoundland and Nova Scotia a much greater share of offshore oil revenues - may not pass a vote in the House of Commons:

Federal cabinet minister Geoff Regan says Conservative Leader Stephen Harper's threats to vote against a Liberal money bill jeopardizes the offshore revenue deal worth billions of dollars to Atlantic Canada. Harper has suggested his party will vote against Bill C-43, claiming it contains provisions concerning the Kyoto Accord to reduce emissions blamed for global warming. Regan says if the Conservatives defeat the budget bill, the changes to offshore revenue sharing will also be defeated. Part 12 of Bill C-43 authorizes Parliament to provide an estimated $2.6 billion into Newfoundland and Labrador's coffers over eight years. Nova Scotia would receive some $1.1 billion. Regan says he is concerned. He says the Liberals have no plans to remove the revenue-sharing deal from the main bill, as the budget is the place where it makes sense to have it.

The St. John's Telegram has more details (the story can be found at their nightmarishly designed website, but you have to go through the "News" menu to find it):

The Liberals tabled Bill C-43 late Thursday — shortly before Parliament recessed for Easter.

The bill includes the legislation that would implement the new Atlantic Accord offshore revenue-sharing arrangement.

But the Accord legislation was bundled up in a budget bill with a grab bag of other issues — including aspects of the Kyoto accord.

On Thursday, Conservative Leader Stephen Harper vowed to vote against Kyoto-related provisions in Bill C-43.

That sets up a game of chicken which could lead to a snap election no party claims to want.

It could also derail the implementation of the Atlantic Accord deal, which is worth at least $2 billion to Newfoundland and Labrador over the next eight years.

Harper accused the Liberals of seeking “unlimited power to implement Kyoto without ever bringing a plan to Parliament.

“This is a back door way … a dangerous way of proceeding, and it will certainly not have the support of this party,” he told the Commons after the bill was introduced.

NDP Leader Jack Layton and Bloc Quebecois Leader Gilles Duceppe both said they would vote against the bill even though they support the Kyoto treaty, because they disagree with the budget as a whole.

If all three opposition parties vote against it, the government could fall.
[...]
[Bloc leader Gilles Duceppe] said if the Liberals want support on Kyoto they should produce a bill devoted to that issue, not just lump Kyoto provisions into the budget legislation.

Layton said Canadians don’t want an election “but when we see this kind of game-playing with budgets, it makes it very difficult.”

Loyola Hearn, the Conservative MP for St. John’s South-Mount Pearl, called the decision to fuse the Accord approval with other legislation a “conniving method of doing this — it’s treachery.”

He accused the Liberals of using the tactic to pit Conservatives against each other, and potentially derail the Accord.

Hearn said Friday that the collapse of the Accord would quiet demands for similar deals from Ontario and Saskatchewan.

“I don’t trust (the Liberals) as far as I can throw them,” Hearn said. “You can see where the pressures are on to kill this bill … If they can blame the loss of this agreement on us or on the Bloc or on the NDP, they’d love it.”

Asked if the Accord is now in jeopardy, Hearn said, “No doubt about it.”

If the legislation goes to a vote as is, Hearn said he would be forced to vote with the Liberals, no matter what the consequences.

“You cannot ever turn your back on your province on an important issue like this, even if it meant your party says, tough stuff, you have to sit in the last seat, last row,” Hearn said.

This decision is exactly what we've come to expect from the Liberals: scummy, and also politically smart. No one has lobbied and agitiated more for this offshore deal than Newfoundland Conservatives - but if C-43 fails and an election is called, you know the Liberals will use it as the centerpiece of their campaign in Atlantic Canada. Would it work? Probably not, if voters are made aware of what really happened, but it would put the Conservatives on the defensive.

If I were a Conservative (or NDP) MP from Newfoundland or Nova Scotia, I would ultimately have to vote for the bill. What the Liberals are doing is sleazy and dishonest - but if the offshore deal fails it would be devastating for this part of the country. It's blackmail - and it may work.

Posted by damian at 07:58 AM | Comments (37)

March 27, 2005

Happy Easter

Alas, I did not take my own advice about refraining from too much chocolate. But who can resist Cadbury's Mini Eggs?

This is the holiest time of year for the Christian faith, so it's a good time to salute the Catholic Archbishop of Bulawayo, Pius Ncube, for bravely speaking out against Robert Mugabe:

A prominent Roman Catholic Archbishop and outspoken critic of President Robert Mugabe called Sunday for peaceful street protests aimed at overthrowing the longtime ruler, saying this week's parliamentary elections are certain to be rigged.

Pius Ncube, bishop of Zimbabwe's second-largest city of Bulawayo, told The Associated Press he was willing to put on his vestments and lead a march to Mugabe's presidential residence himself, but feared: ``If I do it, I do it alone.''

``The people are so scared,'' he said of the political climate in Zimbabwe ahead of the elections. ``You are not going to get that where people are so cowardly.''
[...]
Ncube believes Mugabe's Zimbabwe African National Union-Patriotic Front party will easily win Thursday's poll, but he said the vote already is tainted by years of violence, intimidation and repressive laws. He pointed out that the military will be overseeing the count, and he accused them of cheating for Mugabe.

The main opposition group is Movement for Democratic Change, headed by Morgan Tsvangirai.

``I hope that people get so disillusioned that they really organize against the government and kick him out by a nonviolent, popular, mass uprising,'' Ncube said in a separate interview with the South African newspaper The Sunday Independent.

``Because as it is, people have been too soft with this government. So people should pluck up just a bit of courage and stand up against him and chase him away.''

Ncube confirmed the comments to the AP but was more guarded in an interview conducted over Zimbabwe's state-monitored telephone lines. Calls for unauthorized protests are punishable by up to 20 years in jail under Zimbabwe's harsh Public Order and Security Act.

Posted by damian at 08:24 PM | Comments (4)

March 25, 2005

Don't eat too much chocolate

It's a much-needed long weekend, and I'm going to my grandmother's place for a few days. Back Monday morning. Happy Easter to all my readers, and I hope the Cadbury Easter Bunny brings you lots of cream eggs.

Posted by damian at 08:34 AM | Comments (14)

March 24, 2005

Quote of the Day

"Kyrgyz prtstrs vrthrw gvrnmt, prsdnt lvs cntry"

- headline on FARK.com

The actual story can be found here. Welcome to the free world, my Kyrgyz friends.

Posted by damian at 05:11 PM | Comments (1)

Sorry, deserters

Once again, we learn that Iraq ain't Vietnam:

The Immigration and Refugee Board has denied refugee status to Jeremy Hinzman, the U.S. soldier who fled to Canada to avoid the war in Iraq.

Hinzman, 26, fled military service because he calls the Iraq war illegal. He had been seeking political refugee status in Canada, arguing that he would be jailed if he returned to the U.S. and his life would be in danger.

Hinzman said he believed he would be treated more harshly in prison because of his views on the Iraq war.

But the refugee board said Thursday that Hinzman had not made a convincing argument that he faces persecution or cruel and unusual punishment in the United States.

His lawyer, Jeffry House, said he would ask the Federal Court to review the decision.
[...]
Deserters from countries with compulsory military service have been granted refugee status in Canada. But since Hinzman volunteered for military service, this case was considered different.

If he had been granted refugee status, some critics said would have opened the door for even more U.S. deserters to arrive in Canada.

Now, where are we going to find new hosts for CBC Radio?

Posted by damian at 03:45 PM | Comments (6)

I get results

Daimnation!, March 22: [NASCAR is] looking at putting a road-course race in Toronto, Montreal or somewhere in between. A race at the Montreal F1 track would be a blast - but if I had my way, they'd bring Mosport back up to standard and hold it there.

TSN.ca, March 24: Mosport International Raceway in Bowmanville, Ontario, is the leading candidate to land a NASCAR stock car race as soon as 2006, according to a report in the Toronto Sun.

I'd also like a Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren, and I want Arrested Development renewed for another season. I'm just sayin'.

Posted by damian at 11:40 AM | Comments (1)

Teaching hate

Two teachers at an Islamic school in Ottawa have been suspended for praising and encouraging a violent, anti-Semitic story written by a student. (Apologists for this kind of thing will say the story was "anti-Zionist" instead of anti-Jewish, despite the repeated references to killing "Jews" and the charming illustration of a Star of David in flames.)

Two teachers at the Abraar Islamic school in Ottawa were suspended yesterday pending an investigation into the encouragement or incitement of hatred against Jews expressed in a young student's violence-laden writing project.

Principal Aisha Sherazi said the seven-member school board and administration were "shocked" by teacher involvement in the project that was brought to her attention by the Citizen yesterday morning, and decided at an emergency meeting to suspend the instructors.

One teacher was apparently involved in the artistic production of the eight-page story of killing and martyrdom. Handwritten in Arabic and titled The Long Road, the cover page was illustrated by a drawing of a burning Star of David beside a machine-gun and Palestinian flag atop the Dome of the Rock, an ancient Muslim shrine in Jerusalem.

The other teacher had written comments on the student's paper, praising the boy's story of revenge for the assassination by Israeli forces a year ago of Sheik Ahmed Yassin, a co-founder of Hamas, in retaliation for suicide bombings against Israeli civilians.

"God bless you, your efforts are good," the teacher wrote on the title page. "The story of the hero Ahmed and the hero Salah is still alive. The end will be soon when God unites us all in Jerusalem to pray there."
[...]
Mrs. Sherazi declined to name the student, for privacy reasons, or the teachers until the investigation is complete. "Then we'll see what action we decide we want to take," she said.

Mrs. Sherazi, a 32-year-old teacher who took over as principal in recent months, does not speak or read Arabic. She expressed surprise about the drawing and the story, even though it had reportedly been displayed in a glass case at the school. [emphasis added]

(via Nealenews)

Posted by damian at 11:11 AM | Comments (30)

One-sided Survivor

The "Ulong" tribe has lost every immunity challenge so far, and has now been reduced to three members. Normally there would have been a merge or reshuffle by now, but I think this year they're just going to let the tribe completely die off.

Last night, I figured James was in trouble when the "impenetrable" knots he supposedly learned in the Navy were untied by the Koror tribe with relative ease. When he made that snarky comment about Ibrahim and "Allah", I knew he was toast. Does anyone think they would have shown that if he hadn't been voted off?

Posted by damian at 09:03 AM | Comments (2)

Fake But Accurate II: Armed and Fabulous

After the Terri Schiavo story heated up, ABC reported on a cynical memo allegedly circulated among Republican Senators, which described how the GOP could use the controversy to shore up its pro-life base. But Power Line - which was instrumental in breaking the Rathergate story - has raised some serious questions about the memo's authenticity.

Is Mary Mapes working for ABC now?

Posted by damian at 07:30 AM | Comments (1)

March 23, 2005

If you think the Guardian is too conservative...

...here's the newspaper for you:

Many newspaper readers might be surprised that the Morning Star is still published, others might dismiss it as a historical anomaly. But - somehow - the paper lives on even after the collapse of its beloved communism.

It's a sign of the times for old-style left-wingers that when they click on morningstar.co.uk they get a financial services website.

But the Morning Star, the left-wing daily newspaper, hasn't disappeared - it's still flying the flag in its 75th year. The political landscape might have changed utterly - and Soviet-style Communism might have been swept away - but the newspaper is still appearing each morning on the news stands.

Not without a struggle. Because unlike the other daily papers on the news racks, it depends on fund-raising drives by its readers, needing £16,000 in monthly donations and the proceeds of "jumble sales and second-hand book sales" to keep the paper afloat.
[...]
The newspaper is still linked to the Communist Party - but the editor says that the paper now appeals to a much wider spectrum of the broad left, rather than a narrowly dogmatic set of followers.

This includes contributions from people like Ken Livingstone, Jon Pilger and George Galloway, he says. This follows other famous writers including Virginia Woolf. [emphasis added]

Posted by damian at 05:54 PM | Comments (0)

How the Nazis stayed popular

A new book, Hitler's People's State (set to be published in English next year), argues that the Nazis kept ordinary Germans mollified with a generous welfare state, full employment and low taxes - mostly paid for with wealth plundered from the Jews and the conquered nations of Europe:

A well-respected German historian has a radical new theory to explain a nagging question: Why did average Germans so heartily support the Nazis and Third Reich? Hitler, says Goetz Aly, was a "feel good dictator," a leader who not only made Germans feel important, but also made sure they were well cared-for by the state.

To do so, he gave them huge tax breaks and introduced social benefits that even today anchor the society. He also ensured that even in the last days of the war not a single German went hungry. Despite near-constant warfare, never once during his 12 years in power did Hitler raise taxes for working class people. He also -- in great contrast to World War I -- particularly pampered soldiers and their families, offering them more than double the salaries and benefits that American and British families received. As such, most Germans saw Nazism as a "warm-hearted" protector, says Aly, author of the new book "Hitler's People's State: Robbery, Racial War and National Socialism" and currently a guest lecturer at the University of Frankfurt. They were only too happy to overlook the Third Reich's unsavory, murderous side.

Financing such home front "happiness" was not simple and Hitler essentially achieved it by robbing and murdering others, Aly claims. Jews. Slave laborers. Conquered lands. All offered tremendous opportunities for plunder, and the Nazis exploited it fully, he says.

Once the robberies had begun, a sort of "snowball effect" ensued and in order to stay afloat, he says Germany had to conquer and pilfer from more territory and victims. "That's why Hitler couldn't stop and glory comfortably in his role as victor after France's 1940 surrender." Peace would have meant the end of his predatory practices and would have spelled "certain bankruptcy for the Reich."

That may help to explain the Nazi invasion of the USSR, too. The book sounds interesting - though its thesis will almost certainly be abused by idiots all over the political spectrum, who will argue that low tax rates and/or social programs are "just like what the Nazis did". (You know someone in Germany is already saying the Americans conquered Iraq to get the oil to pay for tax cuts, because Bush is Hitler!!!.)

Posted by damian at 05:34 PM | Comments (5)

Kill the wabbit, kill the wabbit...

Disney has talked about making a "Passion of the Christ for kids", but I hope this isn't what they have in mind:

A church trying to teach about the crucifixion of Jesus performed an Easter show with actors whipping the Easter bunny and breaking eggs, upsetting several parents and young children.

People who attended Saturday’s performance at Glassport’s memorial stadium quoted performers as saying, “There is no Easter bunny,” and described the show as being a demonstration of how Jesus was crucified.

Melissa Salzmann, who took her 4-year-old son J.T., said the program was inappropriate for young children. “He was crying and asking me why the bunny was being whipped,” Salzmann said.

Patty Bickerton, the youth minister at Glassport Assembly of God, said the performance wasn’t meant to be offensive. Bickerton portrayed the Easter rabbit and said she tried to act with a tone of irreverence.

(via Tim Blair)

Posted by damian at 01:04 PM | Comments (6)

Can we question their patriotism now?

If this ain't treason, the word has no meaning anymore.

The same edition of the Thistle also accuses the Anti-Defamation League of being a Mossad front organization - and backs up the claim by linking to one of the most rabidly anti-semitic sites on earth, 'Radio Islam'.

Posted by damian at 09:08 AM | Comments (7)

Appeal denied

The 11th Circuit Court of Appeals has turned down the appeal to reinsert Terri Schiavo's feeding tube. I guess the Supreme Court is the next - and, one way or the other, final - stop.

Posted by damian at 07:55 AM | Comments (12)

March 22, 2005

NASCAR to Canada?

They're looking at putting a road-course race in Toronto, Montreal or somewhere in between. A race at the Montreal F1 track would be a blast - but if I had my way, they'd bring Mosport back up to standard and hold it there.

Either way, I'm there. At Atlanta this past Sunday, Carl Edwards surged ahead of Jimmy Johnson in the final turn to win by 0.028 seconds.

Posted by damian at 09:06 PM | Comments (4)

You don't have to be Aryan to be a Nazi (but it helps)

Mein Kampf is a big best-seller in the Muslim world, and now The Guardian reports that Jeff Wiese, who carried out a massacre at his high school on a Minnesota Indian reservation, was an aspiring Nazi (sorry, "Libertarian National Socialist Green"):

Jeff Weise, the 17-year-old named in newspaper reports as the gunman in the Red Lake school shooting, may have been investigated last year in connection with a shooting threat to the school, according to posts made on a Nazi website.

Over a five-month period between March and August 2004, someone identifying himself as Weise posted numerous messages on a talkboard hosted by Nazi.org, the website of the Libertarian National Socialist Green party. The party promotes a Nazi philosophy of racial purity.

In March 2004, a chatroom participant tagged Todesengel ("angel of death") began a thread titled "Native American Nationalist?" and introduced himself as "Jeff Weise, a Native American from the Red Lake 'Indian' reservation in Minnesota". Todesengel expressed interest in joining the party and said he had done a great deal of research on Hitler, a man he much admired. Later in the thread, Todesengel changed his tag to NativeNazi.

"When I was growing up, I was taught (like others) that Nazi's were (are) evil and that Hitler was a very evil man, ect," wrote Todesengel, in a quote not corrected for spelling and grammar. "Of course, not for a second did I believe this. Upon reading up on his actions, the ideals and issues the German Third Reich adressed, I began to see how much of a lie had been painted about them. They truly were doing it for the better."

On April 19 2004, he posted to the talkboard: "By the way, I'm being blamed for a threat on the school I attend because someone said they were going to shoot up the school on 4/20, Hitlers birthday, and just because I claim being a National Socialist, guess whom they've pinned?"
[...]
He went on: "It's hard though, being a Native American National Socialist, people are so misinformed, ignorant, and close minded it makes your life a living hell."

The banner on "Nazi.org" (I ain't linking to it) is a Nazi flag colored green instead of red, and as the party's name suggests, their philosophy is an insane mixture of racial separatism, anti-semitism - and radical "deep ecology" environmentalism, complete with links to the likes of Earth First! and Grist magazine. Some of their environmentalist stuff could have been written by David Suzuki, while their articles about the Middle East could have been written by John Pilger.

It's so hard to tell the radical right and radical left apart these days.

Update: as usual in a case like this, one is left wondering how the shooter got access to the guns he used. Weise, it appears, stole at least some of the weapons (as well as a bulletproof vest and police car) from his grandfather, the local police chief.

School shootings seem more common in the United States than in other countries (even accounting for population differences), and unless America has a disproportionate number of homicidal maniacs, relatively lax American gun laws would appear to be the main reason. I'm not sure this particular case can be blamed on them, though.

Posted by damian at 01:20 PM | Comments (19)

Lord of Hate

Lord Ahmed, a Labour Party peer in the British House of Lords, invited rabid Jew-hater Israel Shamir to Westminster to give a speech about how Joooooos control the media.

He has not been expelled from the Labour Party. I am not holding my breath for it to happen.

(via Dodgeblogium)

Posted by damian at 01:16 PM | Comments (4)

NBC's Office

I'm finally starting to warm up to BBC's The Office, and now an American version begins airing on NBC this Thursday. The New York Sun's David Blum says the Americanized Office, against all expectations, is actually quite good.

I'm skeptical, but I'll give it a shot. All in the Family, Sanford & Son and Three's Company were all copied from the Brits, so there's no reason this kind of thing can't be done well. And the participation of Anchorman's Steve Carell and King of the Hill writer Greg Daniels certainly makes it sound promising.

In case you were wondering, a list of Btitish shows copied by the Americans - and vice versa - can be found at Wikipedia.

Posted by damian at 10:57 AM | Comments (2)

Quote of the Day

Law professor Mary Cheh on the Schiavo case:

"If I were the judge who got assigned to this by the computer, I'd flee the country."

The Washington Post article in which Cheh is quoted cites several constitutional experts who say Terri Schiavo's parents are unlikely to overturn the decision to remove her feeding tube, even in federal court. We'll see.

Update: U.S. District Judge James Whittemore has denied the parents' request to have the feeding tube reinserted. The matter is bring appealed to the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals.

Posted by damian at 08:15 AM | Comments (4)

Livingstone: Free Press Kills

Maybe they call him "Red Ken" because he'd like to see the kind of journalism they had in the old Soviet Union:

London’s Mayor Ken Livingstone today blamed the press for the deaths of Diana, Princess of Wales and Dr David Kelly, the Government scientist at the centre of the row over the Iraq war dossiers.

Mr Livingstone, speaking during a phone-in on the LBC 97.3 FM Nick Ferrari programme, said: “The best of reporters are great and courageous people, many of them give their lives to bring us the truth.

“There’s a downside: the real underbelly of British reporting are the scum of the earth and they destroy lives.

“I think if we had better reporting standards in this country David Kelly would be alive. If we didn’t have this paparazzi nonsense Princess Diana would be alive. Bad journalism actually takes people’s lives.

“And then there are the thousands of people whose lives are ruined by intrusive investigations into their private lives.

“I do think, when journalists are saying to me, ‘I’m only doing my job’, I’m sorry they are the thin end of a wedge and at the other end of the wedge you have Rwanda and the holocaust people who say, ‘I am only doing my job. I’m only following orders’.”

Livingstone will bend over backwards to defend anti-Semitic, hatemongering "spiritual leaders" from the Muslim world, but he compares newspaper reporters to the Nazis. Interesting.

(via Harry's Place)

Posted by damian at 08:09 AM | Comments (8)

March 21, 2005

Obligatory Schiavo post

I'm still trying to wrap my head around this tragic case, but Lileks' comments are - as usual - worth repeating:

The Schiavo matter is the Elian Gonzalez case of 2005, a person who stands at the nexus of a variety of irreconcilable issues. Some people wouldn’t care at all if she died, unless she had been the sole occupant of a hospital in Baghdad leveled by an errant Tomahawk; then you’d see her face in every protest march. Some see another step towards the triumph of euthanasia – they stop at the idea of someone being starved against the wishes of her parents, and there’s not another fact that matters. Then there are the people for whom this is an opportunity for horrid mockery, the people who care about nothing (but will find someday that nothing cares so much about them it has taken over their hearts completely.) Others demonstrate their enthusiasm for pawing through the casket to find the silver lining. Then there are those who brim with passion not just for the state-approved quietus, but with fury for those who oppose it. Fury and impatience. I’m not talking about the people who regard Schiavo as brain dead and believe her guardian should be allowed to carry out what he insists are her wishes, without the state’s intercession – I mean those who show up on message boards and comment forums sneering about vegetables-in-pampers, and have a good larf pointing at the christers with their imaginary friend in the sky who tells them that an angel will come down and give her a brain like the Wizard of Oz or somethin’. It’s this combination of nihilism, cynicism and a flat nasty refusal to even consider the possibility of transcendence, puffed up with that brackish snarkier-than-thou style that makes the Comic Book Guy the patron saint of the Usenet.

I'm a nominal Christian at most, and I deeply resent the implication that only a religious nut would get upset about someone's life being ended without her consent. (The less said about the open mockery being directed at the "brain-dead" Schiavo, the better, except that it says more about the people doing the mocking than about their alleged targets.)

On the other hand, it's certainly possible to oppose the removal of Terri Schiavo's feeding tube while being suspicious, to say the least, of politicians' sudden interest in the matter. (See Dalia Lathwick's Slate article on the subject.) The only other times I can think of a legislature holding special sessions to deal with individual cases were several decades ago, when you needed Parliamentary approval to get a divorce in Canada. (Well, someone told me the Polish legislature held a special sitting to rush through a soccer player's citizenship application in time for the World Cup, but I think that's an urban legend.)

In short, I don't think anyone should rush into making up their minds on this case. Of course, I may as well ask people to stop breathing, for all the good it would do.

Posted by damian at 10:31 PM | Comments (8)

The wave spreads

It's not getting nearly as much attention as the Orange Revolution in Ukraine, or even last year's Rose Revolution in Georgia, but the people of another former Soviet republic have risen up against a tyrant:

Thousands of protesters, some armed with clubs and Molotov cocktails, overran Kyrgyzstan's second-largest city Monday, forcing police to flee as the government lost control of the impoverished southern region of the former Soviet republic.

Demonstrators in Osh burned and stomped on portraits of President Askar Akayev and seized control of the airport. The army did not intervene despite the chaos. No casualties were reported.

The opposition occupied government buildings in five cities and towns across southern Kyrgyzstan, Interior Ministry spokesman Nurdin Jangarayev said. The capital, Bishkek, which is cut off from the south in winter by a high mountain range, remained calm, but the emboldened opposition vowed to press on until Akayev resigns.

"Power in Osh has been taken over by people!" opposition member Anvar Artykov told the crowd. "I congratulate you on our victory and urge you to maintain order."

The protests, involving more than 17,000 people in the affected cities, won the first concession from Akayev an investigation into allegations of widespread vote-rigging in two rounds of parliamentary elections since Feb. 27. The allegations, backed by European observers, have led to demands for Akayev's resignation and to weeks of increasingly violent protests.

Although Central Asia is the last and largest bastion of post-Soviet dictators, Akayev was regarded as the region's most reform-minded leader. But in recent years he has increasingly cracked down, and his reputation was tarnished in 2002 after police killed six demonstrators protesting the arrest of an opposition lawmaker.
[...]
The opposition is convinced that it is being shut out of political life in this mostly Muslim nation of 5 million people. Although Islamic militants have conducted raids in Kyrgyzstan in previous years, religion does not appear to be playing a role in the latest protests.

Kyrgyzstan, which borders China, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan and Kazakhstan, is an energy-rich region of considerable interest to the United States and Russia, which are vying for influence in the area.

Southern Kyrgyzstan has been the scene of a series of incursions in recent years linked to the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan, a group that fought alongside the Taliban against the U.S.-backed government in Afghanistan. U.S. troops and other anti-terrorist coalition forces are based at the Manas airport near Bishkek for air operations in Afghanistan.

Russia condemned Monday's protests, as it did last year with Ukraine.

Vladmir Putin must be getting nervous, and the region's other tyrants - most notably Alexandr Lukashenka of Belarus and the certifiable Saparmyrat Niyazov in Turkmenistan - must be absolutely terrified. Good.

Posted by damian at 07:20 PM | Comments (0)

Google's dreadful judgment

I've been critical of Google News for including conspirozoid and Islamofascist "news" sources, but that hasn't stopped me from making it my default web page. This might be the last straw, however.

Posted by damian at 07:14 PM | Comments (1)

A successful convention

On Friday, just as the Conservative Party policy convention was starting, it looked like the party was so divided it would probably split up again. On Monday, according to John Ibbitson, the party looks stronger than ever:

Conservative delegates woke up Saturday morning suddenly aware that their party was once again on the verge of schism. Deputy Leader Peter MacKay had placed the whole conference in jeopardy by warning that a resolution approved Friday at a policy workshop to weight delegate selection in favour of ridings with larger memberships (good for the Alliance side; bad for the PC side) would tear the party apart. Newspaper headlines were devastating, completely eclipsing Mr. Harper's Friday night speech, which was perhaps the best of his career.

Even though Mr. MacKay's histrionics left Mr. Harper so furious that he reportedly took out his frustrations on a chair, the warning had the desired result. On Saturday, MP Scott Reid, author of the contentious resolution, was booed when he pitched the proposal to the full assembly, which then rejected it.

It rejected as well the populist-but-unpopular policies of voter recall and citizen-initiated referendums, truly burying the most obnoxious elements of the old Reform legacy. And both the party leadership and its policy platform have pledged not to bring forward legislation on abortion, a dog that almost all Canadians want to let lie.

So are the Tories now virtually indistinguishable from the Liberals? Hardly. The party affirmed its commitment to increasing private-sector participation in medicare; pledged to reopen dialogue on the missile-defence program; condemned the Liberals' child-care program; reaffirmed its opposition to the Kyoto accord; emphasized the primacy of tax cuts in its economic agenda; and promised to permanently transfer part of the fiscal spending power to provinces, which would curtail the role of the federal government in social policy. And the Conservatives confirmed their determination to overturn the Liberals' same-sex marriage legislation, as soon as the party comes to power.

Some of the core conservative policies will offend voters in Toronto, Vancouver and Montreal. Others will offend francophone voters in Quebec. But at least the policies have been openly debated and affirmed by both sides of the conservative coalition. The Liberals can no longer accuse the Conservatives of a hidden agenda; it's there for all to see.

Ezra Levant, Greg Staples and Peter Rempel have more.

Posted by damian at 07:24 AM | Comments (15)

Cleaning up Haifa Street

Haifa Street, a thoroughfare in what used to be Baghdad's old city (before Saddam bulldozed it in the 1980s), has been an insurgent stronghold since the city fell almost two years ago. But according to John Burns of The New York Times, there are definite signs that the tide is turning:

American soldiers call the street Purple Heart Boulevard: the First Battalion of the Ninth Cavalry, patrolling here for the past year before its recent rotation back to base at Fort Hood, Tex., received more than 160 Purple Hearts. Many patrols were on foot, to gather intelligence on neighborhoods that American officers say have been the base for brutal car bombings, kidnappings and assassinations across Baghdad.

In the first 18 months of the fighting, the insurgents mostly outmaneuvered the Americans along Haifa Street, showing they could carry the war to the capital's core with something approaching impunity.

But American officers say there have been signs that the tide may be shifting. On Haifa Street, at least, , insurgents are attacking in smaller numbers, and with less intensity; mortar attacks into the Green Zone have diminished sharply; major raids have uncovered large weapons caches; and some rebel leaders have been arrested or killed.

American military engineers, frustrated elsewhere by insurgent attacks, are moving ahead along Haifa Street with a $20 million program to improve electricity, sewer and other utilities. So far, none of the work sites have been attacked, although a local Shiite leader who vocally supported the American projects was assassinated on his doorstep in January.

But the change American commanders see as more promising than any other here is the deployment of large numbers of Iraqi troops. American commanders are eager to shift the fighting in Iraq to the country's own troops, allowing American units to pull back from the cities and, eventually, to begin drawing down their 150,000 troops. Haifa Street has become an early test of that strategy.

Last month, an Iraqi brigade with two battalions garrisoned along Haifa Street became the first homegrown unit to take operational responsibility for any combat zone in Iraq. The two battalions can muster more than 2,000 soldiers, twice the size of the American cavalry battalion that has led most fighting along the street. So far, American officers say, the Iraqis have done well, withstanding insurgent attacks and conducting aggressive patrols and raids, without deserting in large numbers or hunkering down in their garrisons.

If Haifa Street is brought under control, it will be a major step toward restoring order in this city of five million, and will send a wider message: that the insurgents can be matched, and beaten back.

Posted by damian at 07:15 AM | Comments (0)

March 20, 2005

John DeLorean, R.I.P.

The creator of the world's best known time machine has passed away at age 80:

John Z. DeLorean, an automotive innovator who left General Motors Corp. to develop a radically futuristic sports cars only to see that venture crash spectacularly as he fought federal drug charges, has died at age 80.

DeLorean was among just a handful of U.S. entrepreneurs who dared start a car company in the last 75 years.

While apt to be remembered popularly as the man behind the car modified for time travel in the "Back to the Future" movies, DeLorean left a powerful imprint in automaking built on unique, souped-up cars.

DeLorean died late Saturday at Overlook Hospital in Summit, N.J., of complications from a recent stroke, said Paul Connell, an owner of A.J. Desmond & Sons Funeral Directors in Royal Oak, Mich., which was handling arrangements.
[...]
DeLorean's company collapsed in 1983, a year after he was arrested in Los Angeles and accused of conspiring to sell $24 million of cocaine to salvage his venture.

DeLorean used an entrapment defense to win acquittal on the drug charges in 1984, despite a videotape in which he called a suitcase full of cocaine "good as gold."

The British government lost the equivalent of $94 million over its heavy subsidies for the plant in West Belfast, granted with the hope that the venture's 2,000 jobs would weaken support for the Irish Republican Army, which was then fighting to end British rule in Northern Ireland.

DeLorean was later cleared of defrauding investors, but continuing legal entanglements kept him on the sidelines of the automotive world, although his passion for cars did not abate. After declaring bankruptcy in 1999, he said he wanted to produce a speedy plastic sports car selling for only $20,000.

Whatever questionable activities he may have been involved with later in life, the man did approve the creation of the Pontiac GTO, an act for which every car lover owes him a debt of gratitude. And while the underpowered DeLorean never lived up to the hype, you gotta admit that the car (designed by the legendary Giorgetto Giugiaro) looked pretty darn cool in 1981. Had the company made it to the summer of 1985, when Back to the Future was released, who knows what might have been?

DeLorean.JPG

(DeLorean image via this site, which has everything you ever wanted to know about the car.)

Posted by damian at 08:26 PM | Comments (8)

"We have been brought from darkness to light."

Today is the second anniversary of the American-led invasion of Iraq. Husayn, an Iraqi blogger (and, Eric Alterman would say, a CIA/Mossad agent), has written an extraordinary post on the subject:

To may outsiders, like those who protested last year, who will protest today. This was a fools errand, it brought nothing but death and destruction. I am sheltered in Iraq, but I know how the world feels, how people have come to either love or hate Bush, as though heis the emobdiement of this war. As though this war is part of Bush, they forget the over twenty million Iraqis, they forget the Middle Easterners, they forget the average person on the street, the average man with the average dream.

Ask him if it was worth it. Ask him what is different. Ask him if he would go through it again, go ahead ask him, ask me, many of you have.

Now I answer you, I answer you on behalf of myself, and my countrymen. I dont care what your news tells you, what your television and newspapers say, this is how we feel. Despite all that has happened. Despite all the hurt, the pain, blood, sweat and tears. These two years have given us hope we never had.

Before March 20, 2003, we were in a dungeon. We did not see the light. Saddam Hussain was crushing Iraq's spirit slowly, we longed for his end, but knew we could not challenge him, or his diabolical seed who would no doubt follow him and continue his generation of hell on Earth.

Since then, we now have hope. Hope is not a tangible thing, but it is something, it is more than being blinded by darkness, by being stuck in a mental pit without any future.

Hope has been the greatest product of the last two years. No doubt, many have died, many have died by accident or due to crimes. But their sacrifices are not, and will not be for nothing. I refuse to let it be, and my countrymen stand with me.

There is more. There is much more. Read it all.

Meanwhile, on the other end of the spectrum, "peace" protestors are trying to adopt the purple-stained finger as a symbol of their cause. How dare they.

Posted by damian at 08:11 PM | Comments (1)

Elmasry's freudian slip

To be honest, I can't really make much sense out of this column by Mohammed "All Israelis are legitimate targets" Elmasry, which appears to suggest that the Islamic faith is threatened by females leading Muslim prayer services and Muslim groups sending sending condolences to family members of slain RCMP officers. But I have to ask, considering Elmasry's past, what he meant by this curious choice of words:

Growing instances of Muslims dying to fit in, and losing so much in the effort, are deeply connected to ways in which North American Muslims have been steadily losing their civil liberties since 9/11.

In fact, they are replacing Blacks as the ethno-cultural group most targeted by racial profiling through police and other civil authorities; and sadly, they are replacing Jews as the group most singled out by hate-crime perpetrators. In today's sad reality, not a single place of worship in Canada or the U.S is spied on more than mosques. [emphasis added]

(via Kathy Shaidle)

Posted by damian at 12:16 PM | Comments (0)

A new era in F1

Another victory for Renault, this time with Fernando Alonso behind the wheel. Michael Schumacher being passed by Red Bull driver Christian Klein might be the enduring image of the 2005 season. Ferrari does have a new car coming out soon, and you can be sure they're rushing it into production. (Both Red Bull drivers, by the way, finished in the points again.)

BAR, last year's surprise team, courted a storm of controversy by deliberately pulling both its cars off the track near the end of the Australian GP so they could install new Honda engines for Malysia. (The FIA closed that loophole shortly thereafter.) At Sepang, the BARs were the only cars running brand-new, unused engines - and they both blew up within three laps of the start. How can Honda, the company that makes the world's most reliable cars, also make the world's most unreliable F1 engines?

Villeneuve qualified behind Sauber teammate Felipe Massa again, and spun out about halfway through the race. The smart money says he won't finish the season.

Posted by damian at 12:03 PM | Comments (1)

March 19, 2005

Not antiwar, but on the other side

"Peace" activists all over the world are mourning the fall of Saddam Hussein today, and in London an Iranian refugee group wanted to address the crowd to speak out against American intervention in their country - but also to denounce Iran's theocratic fascist government.

The "Stop the War Coalition" wouldn't allow it:

You are aware that in an act of protest against the threats of military intervention by the US and its allies inIran, 5 Iranian asylum seekers have set off on foot from Birmingham on 12th March to join the national anti-war demonstration in London on March 19th. They are undertaking this action both to highlight and oppose the threats against Iran and to appeal to progressive and freedom loving people in Britain to support their struggle against the barbaric regime in Iran. We phoned your office on Friday, 11th March to ask for support for the protest walk and to ask about the possibility of a representative from the walk saying a few words from the platform at the end of the march. We were told to explain our position and, upon my explanation, were told STWC "can not allow any statement against the Islamic regime in Iran from the platform."

Some London NaziMidiots, naturally, accuse the Iranians of being CIA agents.

(via Harry's Place - which also notes that turnout at protests all over Europe has been absolutely dismal)

Posted by damian at 06:59 PM | Comments (4)

"The new Stasi"

That's what Tina Brown, last seen editing one of the biggest flops in magazine history and hosting a TV show nobody watches, calls bloggers.

I should be offended, but to be honest, I'm kind of glad to see someone like Brown implicitly admitting a Communist secret police force was a bad thing.

(via Roger L. Simon)

Update: more vicious - and grossly inaccurate - anti-blog smears in the Minneapolis Star-Tribune.

Are there any fact-checkers at that paper?

Posted by damian at 02:36 PM | Comments (5)

Suspicions confirmed

The Times reconstructs the events leading up to Rafik Hariri's death, and concludes that the Syrians were indeed responsible:

The Times has learnt that Mr Hariri had enraged the Syrians by inspiring a UN resolution demanding that Syria stop interfering in Lebanon. US and UN officials repeatedly warned Syria not to harm Mr Hariri in the months before his death.

In mid-January, under pressure from Damascus, the Lebanese Government withdrew his 70-strong security detail, and immediately after his death the scene of the bombing was swept to remove any evidence of Syrian complicity.
[...]
In August, under pressure from America to withdraw its forces from Lebanon, Syria had engineered changes to the Lebanese constitution to allow its ally, President Lahoud, to extend his term of office.

Mr Hariri, then Prime Minister, was a bitter rival of Mr Lahoud and strongly opposed the move. But Mr Assad summoned him to Damascus. In a 15-minute meeting the Syrian leader told him that the decision had been taken and that he was expected to vote for it in the Lebanese parliament.

Mr Hariri returned to Lebanon and drove straight to his summer residence in the mountains above Beirut. A former aide recalled that his mood was very bleak. “To them (the Syrians), we are all ants,” he quoted Mr Hariri as saying.

But Mr Hariri had his revenge. Using his close ties to President Bush and President Chirac of France, he secretly helped to bring Resolution 1559, calling for Syria to withdraw its forces from Lebanon, before the UN Security Council. “1559 was his baby. He was very proud of it,” a UN official said, though Mr Hariri’s aides played down his involvement.

Poor Baby Assad had no idea what forces he was about to unleash upon the region - and will eventually destroy his tyrannical rule.

Posted by damian at 09:14 AM | Comments (8)

March 18, 2005

War cry of the idiots

Thinking people do not have to be told why the "Bush is Hitler!" slur is outrageous, ignorant and offensive - but that doesn't mean you shouldn't read Victor Davis Hanson's column on the subject:

At first glance, all this wild rhetoric is preposterous. Hitler hijacked an elected government and turned it into a fascist tyranny. He destroyed European democracy. His minions persecuted Christians, gassed over six million Jews, and created an entire fascistic creed predicated on anti-Semitism and the myth of a superior Aryan race.

Whatever one thinks of Bush’s Iraqi campaign, the president obtained congressional approval to invade and pledged $87 billion to rebuild the country. He freely weathered mass street demonstrations and a hostile global media, successfully defended his Afghan and Iraq reconstructions through a grueling campaign and three presidential debates, and won a national plebiscite on his tenure.

In a world that is almost uniformly opposed to the democratic Jewish state, Israel has no better friend than Bush, who in turn is a believer in, not a tormentor of, Christianity. Afghanistan and Iraq, with 50 million freed, have elected governments, not American proconsuls, and there is a movement in the Middle East toward greater democratization — with no guarantee that such elected governments will not be anti-American. No president has been more adamantly against cloning, euthanasia, abortion, or anything that smacks of the use of science to predetermine super-genes or to do away with the elderly, feeble, or unborn.

So what gives with this crazy popular analogy — one that on a typical Internet Google search of “Bush” + “Hitler” yields about 1,350,000 matches?

One explanation is simply the ignorance of the icons of our popular culture. A Linda Ronstadt, Garrison Keillor, or Harold Pinter knows nothing much of the encompassing evil of Hitler’s regime, its execution of the mentally ill and disabled, the systematic cleansing of the non-Aryans from Europe, or mass executions and starvation of Soviet prisoners. Like Prince Harry parading around in his ridiculous Nazi costume, quarter-educated celebrities who have some talent for song or verse know only that name-dropping “Hitler” or his associates gets them some shock value that their pedestrian rants otherwise would not warrant.

Ignorance and arrogance are a lethal combination. Nowhere do we see that more clearly among writers and performers who pontificate as historians when they know nothing about history.

Posted by damian at 12:04 PM | Comments (1)

What's so surprising?

Blogger Pejman Yousefzadeh, writing for Tech Central Station, says there's no reason to be surprised at people in the Middle East demonstrating for democracy and freedom:

President Reagan [being interviewed as the Berlin Wall fell] entertained all of this commentary and questioning, and then, at the end of the interview, he asked for a little extra time to say something. The former President freely admitted that the events going on in Eastern Europe were momentous. But he asked why it was that anyone should be surprised that a people enslaved for over four decades should want to agitate for their freedom. The surprising thing was not that people wanted to be free. Rather, it was that they were enslaved in the first place.

As always, the great liberator cut right to the heart of matters. With the fall of the Berlin Wall still blessedly fresh in our hearts and minds, and with Reagan's bracing perspective to aid and assist us, we should now turn our attention to the Middle East and ask why anyone is surprised that the people of Lebanon, Egypt, Syria, Afghanistan and Iraq should opt and fight for their freedom.

Sectarian dictators in the Middle East try to get their people to buy into the belief that existence is merely the gateway to all kinds of burdens and oppression, and that such oppression can be avoided if only the populace will sacrifice its inherent interest in freedom and liberty for safety and security from the forces of oppression -- forces that respond to the commands of those very sectarian dictators. Meanwhile, the region's religious totalitarians try to convince their people that life on earth is not worth living at all. Rather, people should focus on making their lives as short as possible, and using those lives to commit terrorist acts that supposedly will earn them God's favor.

But the agitation for democracy that is currently going on in the Middle East is upsetting these authoritarian and totalitarian attempts to brainwash and intimidate their people. These Middle Eastern democrats belief that the quality of their present lives matter, that they -- and not a gang of ruthless dictators -- should be the ones who determine the shape and direction of their lives.
[...]
But in the end, we should remember that the fight to help Middle Eastern democrats is aided most all by the deeply-rooted desire of a long-captive people to break the bonds that have shackled them for generations, and to achieve the freedom that so many of us take for granted. And as President Reagan advised us, we should stop being surprised and astonished that people all over the world want to be free. Denials of liberty are social and political anomalies that should be eradicated to the greatest degree possible. To the extent that the international system is capable of it, it should suffer tyrannies with the same degree of patience and forbearance human beings employ to suffer diseases.

And if you are not astonished by the refusal of an individual to suffer a personal disease, then you shouldn't be astonished by the refusal of an entire region to suffer the disease of tyranny. Call the events in the Middle East "thrilling," if you wish. Call them "wonderful," "splendid," "encouraging," "hopeful" and "promising." Just don't call them "surprising." There is no surprise to be had at all.

Posted by damian at 08:36 AM | Comments (9)

How CSIS dropped the ball

Good analysis here of our intelligence service's errors just before and after the Air-India bombing. Most alarmingly, CSIS is still destroying wiretap evidence:

In the wake of the acquittals, fresh questions are being raised about those early mistakes, and about whether CSIS is better equipped today to probe terror threats.

One practice that hasn't changed is that of erasing or shredding transcripts and tapes or recorded wiretaps, which Josephson said amounted to "unacceptable negligence" in the Air-India case.

Just three months ago, a Montreal judge told government lawyers it was "totally unacceptable" that CSIS had destroyed the original notes of interviews with terrorism suspect Adil Charkaoui. During the 2001 trial of former Canadian resident Ahmed Ressam, the so-called millennium bomber who was convicted in the U.S. of plotting to blow up the Los Angeles airport, U.S. District Court Judge John Coughenour said he was "very troubled that the tape recordings (from CSIS) don't exist anymore." He added: "Apparently, this is the Canadian way of doing things."

CSIS was unprepared for a major terrorist attack in 1985, and I fear they aren't much more prepared today.

Posted by damian at 08:28 AM | Comments (5)

March 17, 2005

The Air-India verdict

It's the top story on every Canadian newscast today, but I haven't written anything about it until now, because I simply don't know what to say. As an unabashed anti-terror hawk, I hate seeing terrorist suspects walk free - but I'm also a libertarian-leaning criminal defence lawyer, and as such I have to accept that a person should not be convicted if there remains a reasonable doubt about his guilt.

Christie Blatchford, no bleeding heart, writes that no other outcome was possible, considering the government's shoddy case:

A two-decades-old case with the best evidence long destroyed by agents and bureaucrats of the victims' own government; a passel of disreputable witnesses motivated by naked self-interest, few of whom could be relied upon to accurately report even the time of day; an alert group of surveillance-aware, careful suspects from an immigrant community that once was largely impenetrable: That's what made up the Air-India prosecutorial case.

No wonder it collapsed in ruins yesterday, a few months shy of 20 years after Air-India Flight 182 blew up over the Atlantic Ocean off the coast of Ireland, killing all 329, most of them Canadians, who were aboard.

It might seem, at first blush, to be a monumental failure of this country's criminal justice system.

And there was failure, but it came in the months immediately before and after the bombing and chiefly at the hands of the then-rookie Canadian Security Intelligence Service, which had been conducting electronic surveillance of the late Talwinder Singh Parmar, the man acknowledged as the mastermind of the bombing plot, and then systematically destroyed the evidence almost as fast as it came in.

All but 54 of the 289 tapes made of calls to and from Mr. Parmar's home were being routinely erased, even after the bombing, while CSIS brass continued to stall requests from the Royal Canadian Mounted Police for help. Most of those tapes were never transcribed properly, let alone verbatim.

There's much, much more, and even if you aren't a Globe and Mail subscriber you can read the whole thing by searching for "Blatchford" on Google News Canada. The scariest thing about this disaster is that it reveals, in glaring detail, the incompetence and unpreparedness of our anti-terror services - and you a lot of dubious characters have been following this case very carefully.

329 innocent people, including 160 Canadian citizens, were killed in the Air-India bombing. A list of victims can be found here. And some of their killers are having a grand laugh today.

Posted by damian at 08:36 PM | Comments (9)

Respect my authoritah!

Jeremy C. Wright, a Canadian who runs the Ensight technology blog, was stopped at the U.S. border by some Officer Barbrady-wannabe who doesn't understand this whole "e-mail" thing:

Him: Why would you visit someone in the states you’d never met (I mentioned I was planning to visit several people whilst down there)

Me: Well, I have met most of them, but I’ve talked to them dozens or hundreds of times online.

Him: Do you have any of their phone numbers?

Me: No, but I talk

Him: You can’t talk to someone without a phone number. Stop lying to me.

Me: No, really, I can talk from my computer to theirs

Him: Don’t be a smartass. If you don’t have their phone number, and you’ve never met them, how can you have ever talked to them.

Me: … (at this point I’ve learned that sarcasm doesn’t help, nor does answering questions he doesn’t want to hear the answer to)

Him: So, you’re trying to tell me that you’re going to visit someone who you’ve never met, never talked to and who knows nothing about you? And I’m supposed to believe this?

Me: … (This was two hours in, and minutes before I demanded to be released)

More details here. Most Canadians - probably even me - would have come back from such an interrogation spitting fire at "ignorant Americans and their trigger-happy, paranoid border guards", but Wright handles the matter with genuine class.

Posted by damian at 06:27 PM | Comments (5)

Bizarro World II

University of Sydney Economics (!) Professor Tim Anderson in the Green Left Weekly ("The Leafy Obergruppenführers"):

There is no general climate of fear [in Cuba]. People do speak freely, criticising their government, but criticising the US government far more. Cubans also participate at much higher levels than Australians in political system.

Posted by damian at 12:58 PM | Comments (2)

Bizarro world I

Eric Margolis (uh-oh) in the Toronto Sun:

...the man most responsible for pushing the Arab world towards political change is not George W. Bush, but his nemesis, Osama bin Laden. For over a decade, bin Laden has agitated for the overthrow of the corrupt, despotic Arab regimes supported by the U.S., and their replacement by a traditional Islamic democratic consensus.

Posted by damian at 12:56 PM | Comments (2)

He couldn't resist

On his way to the opening of a Holocaust museum in Jerusalem, Kofi Annan couldn't pass up the opportunity to pay his respects to the UN's favorite Jew-killer:

U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan's decision to lay a wreath at the grave of Yasser Arafat while on his way to the dedication of a Holocaust museum in Israel is infuriating New York politicians and Jewish leaders, some of whom are labeling Mr. Annan's gesture "outrageous," "grotesque," and an example of "mindless incompetence."

The secretary-general joined world leaders in Israel on Tuesday to commemorate the opening of a new Holocaust museum in Jerusalem. His visit Monday to Mr. Arafat's grave rankled some representatives of the United Nations' host city, who said Mr. Annan had damaged the world body's already poor public image and may have further imperiled U.N. plans to expand into neighboring parts of Turtle Bay.
[...]
A spokesman for Mr. Annan, Fred Eckhard, responded to the Sun yesterday: "Kofi Annan is secretary-general of an organization made up of all nations, and so he could not be in the region without also paying a call on the new president of the Palestinian Authority, Mahmoud Abbas. Arafat's grave lies within the compound of the president's residence, and the secretary-general, like every international visitor to the residence, paid his respects at Arafat's resting place."

The executive vice chairman of the New York-based Conference of Presidents of Major Jewish Organizations, Malcolm Hoenlein, however, questioned the need for the diplomatic community to honor a figure Palestinians themselves are trying to forget.

"I find it troubling when people elevate the status of a terrorist, especially at a time when the Palestinian people have put him behind them. There's no yearning for the good old days. People are still angry about the corruption and the raping of the country in terms of economic exploitation. You can go without laying a wreath," Mr. Hoenlein said.

If Kofi Annan went to Kosovo, would be feel compelled to stop by and visit Slobodan Milosevic in prison?

Posted by damian at 08:32 AM | Comments (19)

March 16, 2005

It's not just the Holocaust

There are people who don't believe Stalin did anything wrong, either. Some of them (probably most of them) are teaching at American universities.

Posted by damian at 08:37 PM | Comments (0)

Conspirozoid field day

Paul Wolfowitz (Volf-o-vitz, according to the BBC) has been nominated by President Bush to run the World Bank. Hernando de Soto would have been my first choice, but any decision which can piss off Guardian and Nation readers this much can't be all bad.

Posted by damian at 08:31 PM | Comments (13)

Sometimes the media can be too balanced

Deborah Lipstadt was scheduled to appear on C-SPAN to discuss her new book about being sued (unsuccessfully) by Holocaust denier David Irving - so, in the interest of fairness, C-SPAN decided it had to air a speech by Irving, too:

Yesterday (3/15), leaders from more than 40 nations gathered in Jerusalem to dedicate a new, expanded Yad Vashem Holocaust museum.

Yet at the very time that this monument to Nazi evil was inaugurated, the American cable network C-SPAN planned to give a notorious Holocaust denier a broad audience to promote his ideology that the murder of six million Jews never occurred. This, in the name of 'journalistic balance'. Here's what happened:

Deborah Lipstadt, Holocaust scholar at Emory University (pictured), will deliver a talk at Harvard University this evening (3/16), promoting her new book, History on Trial: My Day in Court with David Irving. C-SPAN wished to broadcast Lipstadt's talk on the network's BookTV program, but informed Lipstadt that a recent speech of Irving's (recorded by C-SPAN) would need to be broadcast as well.
[...]
C-SPAN, that is, sought out an 'opposing view' to Lipstadt's confirmation of the Nazi Holocaust. Lipstadt refused to be cast side-by-side with Irving, on the grounds that Holocaust denial does not merit public debate. Cohen asks the appropriate question: 'For a book on the evils of slavery, would C-SPAN counter with someone who thinks it was a benign institution?'

David Irving's shoddy methodology and blatant fabrications have been debunked time and time again (most notably in Lying About Hitler by Richard Evans, an expert witness for the defence at the Irving/Lipstadt trial). A short visit to his website (I won't link to it, but it's not hard to find) confirms his racist, anti-Semitic, pro-fascist views. It's disturbing, to say the least, to see people who should know better deciding these views are worthy of being given an audience.

I don't believe the people at C-SPAN are Holocaust deniers, but I do think they're showing absolutely appalling judgment here. Irving should have the right to express his vile opinions, but that doesn't mean C-SPAN or any other network is obligated to put him on television.

Posted by damian at 02:36 PM | Comments (0)

It's been going on longer than we thought

The conventional wisdom about Robert Mugabe is that he was a reasonably fair, democratic ruler in his early years as President of Zimbabwe, and that he only recently became a murderous tyrant. But in this Independent story about a part of the country which supports the opposition (and is being starved of food and oil by the government), there is a disturbing passage which suggests Mugabe has been at this for many, many years:

No one needs to tell the people of Lupane how dangerous it can be to stand up to Mr Mugabe. In the two years between 1982 and 1984 as many as 50,000 people died in a vicious pogrom, dubbed euphemistically by Mr Mugabe himself as the Gukuruhundi: "The rain that washes away the chaff before the spring rains." The rain fell in the form of the notorious Korean-trained 5th Brigade. People were forced to dig their own graves and shot, or bodies were tossed into disused mines. Later the victims were herded into camps to be tortured and killed.

Their commander is now Perence Shiri, the chief of th