Comments: Baby steps for NATO on Afghanistan
Comment by OMMAG:

You know that for the most part the European members of NATO were only in it because the treaty offered them a measure of security from the USSR.
In other words a continuation of the AMERICAN provided defense and security paid for by the US taxpayer. Canada may be a sincere partner in the shared interest concept .... but the Euros never intended to pony up.

France as you well know even pulled out so they could sell weapons and technology to our enemies and violate international nuclear agreements without answering to their supposed allies.

Expecting loyalty and support from these nations is just plain foolish.

That's why we see the lame response to these international crisis!

Posted at 2007-10-26 08:45:22 [PermaLink]
Comment by Hans Rupprecht:

Selling weapons for money is always more important than putting your own troops on the line.

Nice metric for international diplomacy.

Business first, principles come later if ever.

Posted at 2007-10-28 00:56:11 [PermaLink]
Post a comment

All fields are required. HTML tags are disabled, but URLs will automatically be turned into hyperlinks. Your e-mail address will not be posted anywhere on the site.
You must preview your message before posting.