Jailed because they could not afford financial penalties? what drivel. They were jailed for being in persistent criminal contempt of an injunction issued because the court found their treaty claim of breach of duty to consult to be unsubstantiated and too spurious to block the simple staking of claims. Typical misinformation from the Mop & Pail.
Posted at 2008-04-10 07:25:02 [PermaLink]